Notices
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 51

Thread: FA awards game to Man U

  1. #1 Default FA awards game to Man U 
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,034
    The FA today awarded the FA Cup tie to Manchester after accepting Patrice Evra's claim that his team in fact scored 6 times. Despite 5 of the goals not being caught by any of the players, the crowd, or the TV cameras, the FA found Mr. Evra a very convincing witness. On other hand, 'we found Mr. Reina's testimony to be totally unreliable. He admitted conceding one goal but was unable to come up with any evidence at all of saving any of the other 5. Since Mr. Reina could not prove he saved 5 goals, we concluded that they must have been scored'. The referee said that he didn't recall 6 goals being scored but couldn't be sure as he threw his notes away after the game.

    Responding to comments that Mr. Evra had at various times after the game claimed his team had scored 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 goals, the panel found that Mr. Evra, not being a native speaker of English, had confused these numbers and thought they all meant 6.

    LFC have been urged not to appeal by fair play campaigners saying that Man U won fair and square and the team should not condone cheating.
    Last edited by GottaWearShades; 29-1-12 at 23:07. Reason: typos
    Reply With Quote  

  2. #2  
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    3,667
    ******* *******. You had me spooked there with that title.
    Reply With Quote  

  3. #3  
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    918
    brilliant!!
    Reply With Quote  

  4. #4  
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    18,199
    omg the FA are just hav it in for us reds don't they!! so angry right now.
    Reply With Quote  

  5. #5  
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    3,053
    Typical FA.
    Reply With Quote  

  6. #6  
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    14,112
    Ridiculous!!
    Reply With Quote  

  7. #7  
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    24,621
    Oh for **** sake this is going to far, they have it in for us for sure....
    Reply With Quote  

  8. #8  
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    1,453
    The title scared me there, good job!

    Reply With Quote  

  9. #9  
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    15,998
    Quote Originally Posted by GottaWearShades View Post
    The FA today award the FA Cup tie to Manchester after accepting Patrice Evra's claim that his team in fact scored 6 times. Despite 5 of the goals not being caught by any of the players, the crowd, or the TV cameras, the FA found Mr. Evra a very convincing witness. On other hand, 'we found Mr. Reina's testimony to be totally unreliable. He admitted conceding one goal but was unable to come up with any evidence at all of saving any of the other 5. Since, Mr. Reina could not prove he saved 5 goals, we concluded that they must have been scored'. The referee said that he didn't recall 6 goals being scored but couldn't be sure as he threw his notes away after the game.

    Responding to comments that Mr. Evra had at very times after the game claimed his team had scored 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 goals, the panel found that Mr. Evra, not being a native speaker of English, had confused these numbers and thought they all meant 6.

    LFC have been urged not to appeal by fair play campaigners saying that Man U won far and square and the team should not condone cheating.
    Genuine question:- Is this true?
    Reply With Quote  

  10. #10  
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    24,621
    Quote Originally Posted by RedBaros View Post
    Genuine question:- Is this true?
    It's on the sky sports scrolly thing on the bottom of the screen......(can't remember the name of it).

    Blasted FA screwed us over again!!
    Reply With Quote  

  11. #11  
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    16,474
    Well I believe it for sure


    Brilliant OP
    Reply With Quote  

  12. #12  
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,034
    Quote Originally Posted by RedBaros View Post
    Genuine question:- Is this true?
    No. It's not true of course. I was just trying to show the absurdity of what happened to Luis. For those who haven't been through the report, this is pretty close to the FA's case on the multiple abuse allegation. I'm not kidding on that point - that is basically their argument.

    Very very happy.
    Reply With Quote  

  13. #13  
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    24,621
    Quote Originally Posted by GottaWearShades View Post
    No. It's not true. I was just trying to show the absurdity of what happened to Luis. For those who haven't been through the report, this is pretty close to the FA's case on the multiple abuse allegation. I'm not kidding on that point - that is basically their argument.

    Very very happy.
    I'm sure he knows it's not true....
    Reply With Quote  

  14. #14  
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    15,998
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpoolforme View Post
    It's on the sky sports scrolly thing on the bottom of the screen......(can't remember the name of it).

    Blasted FA screwed us over again!!
    I find it incredible in this day and age that even with the technology we have, the FA can get away with things like this. Shambolic, but I suppose we'll try again next year. I can only assume Mr Evra had a solid case. I don't need ssn proof of what you say. Blasted FA is correct.
    Reply With Quote  

  15. #15  
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    15,998
    Quote Originally Posted by GottaWearShades View Post
    No. It's not true of course. I was just trying to show the absurdity of what happened to Luis. For those who haven't been through the report, this is pretty close to the FA's case on the multiple abuse allegation. I'm not kidding on that point - that is basically their argument.

    Very very happy.

    Hmm
    Reply With Quote  

  16. #16  
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    13,621
    Quote Originally Posted by GottaWearShades View Post
    The FA today award the FA Cup tie to Manchester after accepting Patrice Evra's claim that his team in fact scored 6 times. Despite 5 of the goals not being caught by any of the players, the crowd, or the TV cameras, the FA found Mr. Evra a very convincing witness. On other hand, 'we found Mr. Reina's testimony to be totally unreliable. He admitted conceding one goal but was unable to come up with any evidence at all of saving any of the other 5. Since, Mr. Reina could not prove he saved 5 goals, we concluded that they must have been scored'. The referee said that he didn't recall 6 goals being scored but couldn't be sure as he threw his notes away after the game.

    Responding to comments that Mr. Evra had at very times after the game claimed his team had scored 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 goals, the panel found that Mr. Evra, not being a native speaker of English, had confused these numbers and thought they all meant 6.

    LFC have been urged not to appeal by fair play campaigners saying that Man U won far and square and the team should not condone cheating.



    As the old sixties song goes i like it, i like it
    Reply With Quote  

  17. #17  
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,034
    Quote Originally Posted by Liverpoolforme View Post
    I'm sure he knows it's not true....
    Yes. I know. I went back to add the of course bit but you were too quick for me - just in case anyone had had too many on a Saturday and didn't read the OP properly!
    Reply With Quote  

  18. #18  
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    15,998
    Quote Originally Posted by GottaWearShades View Post
    Yes. I know. I went back to add the of course bit but you were too quick for me - just in case anyone had had too many on a Saturday and didn't read the OP properly!
    Nice idea mate, the OP
    Reply With Quote  

  19. #19  
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    986
    Quote Originally Posted by GottaWearShades View Post
    The FA today award the FA Cup tie to Manchester after accepting Patrice Evra's claim that his team in fact scored 6 times. Despite 5 of the goals not being caught by any of the players, the crowd, or the TV cameras, the FA found Mr. Evra a very convincing witness. On other hand, 'we found Mr. Reina's testimony to be totally unreliable. He admitted conceding one goal but was unable to come up with any evidence at all of saving any of the other 5. Since, Mr. Reina could not prove he saved 5 goals, we concluded that they must have been scored'. The referee said that he didn't recall 6 goals being scored but couldn't be sure as he threw his notes away after the game.

    Responding to comments that Mr. Evra had at very times after the game claimed his team had scored 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 goals, the panel found that Mr. Evra, not being a native speaker of English, had confused these numbers and thought they all meant 6.

    LFC have been urged not to appeal by fair play campaigners saying that Man U won far and square and the team should not condone cheating.
    Absolutely hillarious
    Reply With Quote  

  20. #20  
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    6,331
    Quote Originally Posted by RedBaros View Post
    I find it incredible in this day and age that even with the technology we have, the FA can get away with things like this. Shambolic, but I suppose we'll try again next year. I can only assume Mr Evra had a solid case. I don't need ssn proof of what you say. Blasted FA is correct.
    None of the cameras were pointing at the pitch, they were all trained on the stands looking for fans misbehaving as it makes a bigger news story than the match itself.
    Reply With Quote  

  21. #21  
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    872
    theres nothing on the homepage about this...so mad!!!!
    Reply With Quote  

  22. #22  
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,188
    If I could give some rep to the OP I would give as much as possible. What a brilliant post.
    Reply With Quote  

  23. #23  
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,090
    Outstanding Forum hero,i've got to steal this if you do not mind.

    This is brillant stuff,i was trying to come up with something but this has a special arura about it well done mate.
    Reply With Quote  

  24. #24  
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,437
    Quote Originally Posted by par4 View Post
    Outstanding Forum hero,i've got to steal this if you do not mind.

    This is brillant stuff,i was trying to come up with something but this has a special arura about it well done mate.
    Sorry, already pinched it myself, most accurate summeration of the Suarez incident put across in a lighthearted way yet

    kind of like explaining the offside rule to girls with the purse in the shop.
    Reply With Quote  

  25. #25  
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    18,673
    Quote Originally Posted by RedBaros View Post
    Genuine question:- Is this true?
    On the balance of probabilities, I'm inclined to believe the OP.

    YNWA
    Reply With Quote  

  26. #26  
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    322
    My heart almost stopped mate.
    Reply With Quote  

  27. #27  
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    27,887
    apparently they used the"not so flexible civil standard of the balance of pre-determined probability" so it must be true
    Reply With Quote  

  28. #28  
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    11,328
    Haha well done!
    Reply With Quote  

  29. #29  
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    4,090
    Quote Originally Posted by BVA View Post
    Sorry, already pinched it myself, most accurate summeration of the Suarez incident put across in a lighthearted way yet

    kind of like explaining the offside rule to girls with the purse in the shop.
    Exactly,its just brillant
    Reply With Quote  

  30. #30  
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    13,465
    Quote Originally Posted by GottaWearShades View Post
    The FA today award the FA Cup tie to Manchester after accepting Patrice Evra's claim that his team in fact scored 6 times. Despite 5 of the goals not being caught by any of the players, the crowd, or the TV cameras, the FA found Mr. Evra a very convincing witness. On other hand, 'we found Mr. Reina's testimony to be totally unreliable. He admitted conceding one goal but was unable to come up with any evidence at all of saving any of the other 5. Since, Mr. Reina could not prove he saved 5 goals, we concluded that they must have been scored'. The referee said that he didn't recall 6 goals being scored but couldn't be sure as he threw his notes away after the game.

    Responding to comments that Mr. Evra had at very times after the game claimed his team had scored 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7 goals, the panel found that Mr. Evra, not being a native speaker of English, had confused these numbers and thought they all meant 6.

    LFC have been urged not to appeal by fair play campaigners saying that Man U won far and square and the team should not condone cheating.
    Very good - rep scallion.
    Reply With Quote  

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •